<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Concurrent Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://concurrentmedia.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://concurrentmedia.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Concurrent Media did not go black today by Who lost SOPA? &#124; Concurrent Media</title>
		<link>http://concurrentmedia.com/2012/01/18/why-concurrent-media-did-not-go-black-today/comment-page-1/#comment-3544</link>
		<dc:creator>Who lost SOPA? &#124; Concurrent Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concurrentmedia.com/?p=2370#comment-3544</guid>
		<description>[...] became an epic showdown that forced provisions of the bill into the open. The rest, of course, is Blackout Day history and a new political alignment around the bills on Capitol [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] became an epic showdown that forced provisions of the bill into the open. The rest, of course, is Blackout Day history and a new political alignment around the bills on Capitol [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on YouTube Court: Viacom Dios by Who lost SOPA? &#124; Concurrent Media</title>
		<link>http://concurrentmedia.com/2010/06/24/youtube-court-viacom-dios-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3543</link>
		<dc:creator>Who lost SOPA? &#124; Concurrent Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 03:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=947#comment-3543</guid>
		<description>[...] in cases where infringement has seemed both flagrant and widely acknowledged. And for years, courts have largely refused, reading the language of the statute to require specific notification of specific instances of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in cases where infringement has seemed both flagrant and widely acknowledged. And for years, courts have largely refused, reading the language of the statute to require specific notification of specific instances of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SOPA slips away by Why Concurrent Media did not go black today &#124; Concurrent Media</title>
		<link>http://concurrentmedia.com/2012/01/14/sopa-slips-away/comment-page-1/#comment-3523</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Concurrent Media did not go black today &#124; Concurrent Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concurrentmedia.com/?p=2364#comment-3523</guid>
		<description>[...] the removal of the DNS-blocking provisions from the bills last week, however, much of that danger was eliminated. What&#8217;s left is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the removal of the DNS-blocking provisions from the bills last week, however, much of that danger was eliminated. What&#8217;s left is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft&#8217;s non-disruptive disruption by Microsoft controlling the living room? I sure hope not; at least not mine.</title>
		<link>http://concurrentmedia.com/2011/12/05/microsofts-non-disruptive-disruption/comment-page-1/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft controlling the living room? I sure hope not; at least not mine.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://concurrentmedia.com/?p=2320#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft’s non-disruptive disruption &#8212; from concurrentmedia.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft’s non-disruptive disruption &#8212; from concurrentmedia.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kaleidescape leaves Hollywood blu in the face by Building an HTPC, Part 1 &#124; High-Def Digest: The Bonus View</title>
		<link>http://concurrentmedia.com/2010/05/12/kaleidescape-leaves-hollywood-blu-in-the-face-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3154</link>
		<dc:creator>Building an HTPC, Part 1 &#124; High-Def Digest: The Bonus View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themediawonk.com/?p=929#comment-3154</guid>
		<description>[...] of the leading high-end companies in this area — or at least one of the best known brands due to last year&#8217;s lawsuit — is Kaleidescape Systems. Kaleidescap servers and players seem like great products, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the leading high-end companies in this area — or at least one of the best known brands due to last year&#8217;s lawsuit — is Kaleidescape Systems. Kaleidescap servers and players seem like great products, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

